Supported by smaller states

Why was the New Jersey Plan favored by smaller states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787? The New Jersey Plan was favored by smaller states because it proposed equal representation for each state in a unicameral legislature, unlike the Virginia Plan which favored population-based representation in a bicameral legislature.

Supported by Smaller States

The New Jersey Plan was strongly supported by the smaller states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Contrary to the Virginia Plan, also known as the "large state plan," the New Jersey Plan advocated for a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state. This would ensure that smaller states had the same legislative power as larger ones.

Larger states preferred the Virginia Plan, which proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population, giving them more influence. To resolve this conflict, the Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise, was proposed, incorporating elements of both plans by establishing a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate.

← Witch hunts a historical adventure Unlocking the power of college education a journey towards transformation →

More Posts: