The Impact of the Hijra on the Development of Islam

How did the Hijra influence the development of Islam?

A. During the Hijra, Muhammad created rules that governed the united Muslims.

B. It was where Muhammad went to meditate on the moral ills of Meccan society.

C. It allowed Muhammad to destroy the idols in the Kaaba

D. The Hijra brought Arabs together under loyalty to their family clans.

Answer:

The Hijra was crucial in the development of Islam as it marked the creation of a unified Muslim community under Muhammad's leadership and signaled the beginning of the Islamic calendar.

Therefore, the correct answer is: option A. During the Hijra, Muhammad created rules that governed the united Muslims.

Explanation: During this historic journey in 622 CE, Prophet Muhammad and his followers left Mecca and fled to Medina, where they found refuge. This migration marked the consolidation of the Muslim community, known as the ummah, under Muhammad's direct leadership.

In Medina, Muhammad established not only the religious foundations of Islam but also its social and political dimensions, leading the various tribes and families to a unified Islamic identity. This event was so significant that it marks the beginning of the Islamic lunar calendar, making 622 CE the first year of the After the Hijra (AH) era.

Through the Hijra, Islam transformed from a local movement into a broader social and political force, with Muhammad uniting divergent Arab tribes under the banner of the new religion. The unity brought by Muhammad’s teachings was further solidified when, after the conquest of Mecca, the city's idols and temples were destroyed except for the Kaaba, which was preserved and became the focal point of the Islamic world.

The common language, values, and devotion to one god fostered by Islam had a profound effect on Arabian society, laying the foundation for the rapid expansion of Muslim influence.

← Understanding the meaning of imperative in eisenhower s farewell address The challenge of andrew jackson to the supreme court in the cherokee cases →