Why Does Ethan Earn More Than Karen?

Based on the data, which statement will justify the organization's decision to pay Ethan more than Karen?

A) Ethan is white, and Karen is black.
B) Ethan has more experience than Karen.
C) Karen has a hearing impairment.
D) Men have more stamina, so they can work longer hours.
E) Karen is an immigrant.

Answer:

The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.

Now, let's analyze why option B is the correct answer. In the scenario provided, Ethan earns more than Karen even though they have the same roles and responsibilities in the organization. This decision is justified based on Ethan's higher level of experience compared to Karen.

Option A is discriminatory and goes against equal employment laws. Race should never be a factor in determining salary or job opportunities. Option C is also not a valid reason as individuals with disabilities should not be paid more solely based on their disability.

Option D is a generalization that is not based on individual capabilities. There are women who are equally capable and have the stamina to work long hours. Option E is not relevant as Karen's immigration status should not affect her salary once she is a lawful citizen.

Ultimately, paying Ethan more than Karen based on his experience is a fair and justifiable decision. Experience is a valuable asset in the workplace, and employees with more experience often bring additional skills and knowledge to the table.

← The trial balance analysis of benson company The cross price elasticity of demand between product a and product b →